Despite appearances to the contrary, the stamp above is not the result of a printing error. It represents a deliberate attempt on the part of the designer -- in this case, Osnat Eshel -- to require viewers to either tilt their head twenty degrees clockwise in order to comfortably view the image or, alternatively, rotate the stamp twenty degrees counterclockwise. As a stylistic device, the tilted stamp invites questions: What effect do tilters like Eshel seek to achieve by using the technique? Which designers have been most partial to its application in their stamps? At what point did tilting start to become popular with Israeli stamp designers? Is there a relation between the tilted stamp design and the shaky-cam technique common among some filmmakers?
![]() |
בול שבעים שנה לאקדמיה בצלאל "70th Anniversary of Bezalel" stamp Israel Post (1976) Design: Aryeh Hecht Tilt: 10° |
What effect was Hecht endeavoring to achieve by tilting the images on his stamp? A clue is provided in a 2017 article by Kevin R. Brooks of Macquarie University in Sydney, Australia:
The simulation of depth in artistic works presented on flat media has been a challenge for artists throughout history. Although the objects to be represented are invariably voluminous and are located at various distances, their representations on walls, paper, or canvas are necessarily two dimensional. Historically, artists throughout the world have attempted to imply depth using techniques that exploit the well-known "pictorial" cues to depth.1One of the pictorial cues Brooks references is occlusion, a technique whereby distant surfaces are occluded by overlapping nearer surfaces. By tilting the images on the XY-plane, as well as shading them appropriately, Hecht successfully created an illusion that the key and shapes had depth and volume. In so doing, Hecht was able to capture the spirit of Bezalel, where he was a fourth-year student at the time, as an innovation-leading school of art and design. Hecht's application of tilting was in good taste: it dovetailed elegantly with the design's central motif, served a clear purpose, and enhanced the overall appeal of the stamp.
![]() |
בול שנת הנוער הבין־לאומית "International Youth Year" stamp Israel Post (1985) Design: Naomi & Meir Eshel Tilt: 20° |
Why the Eshels -- at the time they were still a married couple -- chose the motifs of a peace sign, a smiley face and a heart is clear. As universal symbols, these are motifs that transcend language and are understood by kids from a young age. The reason for the cursive handwriting is also self-evident: it was meant to evoke the somewhat sloppy penmanship of an older child or young adult. Conceivably, a related reason dictated the text's twenty-degree tilt. When children are taught to write, they are instructed to experiment with different alignment angles of page to body. Even though the languages are written in opposite directions, the rules for Hebrew and English are identical; to wit, righties are advised to tilt the page counterclockwise and lefties clockwise. Was tilting the text a successful stylistic device? Yes and no. While it lent the stamp a more youthful and handmade look, its clash with the design's rectilinear flow undermined the stamp's compositional unity.
![]() |
בול יובל נמל התעופה בן־גוריון "50th Anniversary of Ben-Gurion Airport" stamp Israel Post (1986) Design: Moshe Pereg Tilt: 30° |
What makes "Ben-Gurion" a visually compelling stamp is first and foremost its play on perspective: the illusion of viewing the airport as though seated on a plane takes effect immediately. Rather than being a static scene, the streaking colors animate the background view of the airport by suggesting motion and speed. That suggestion is augmented by the text beneath the windows, because it and the streaking colors are tilted by the same angle and because the colored stripes embedded in the text, which are also tilted, follow a sequence similar to the stripes seen through the windows. Pereg's application of tilting was purposeful and clever. It served a clear function within the design, imbued it with character, and made the stamp memorable.
![]() |
בול אנה פרנק "Anne Frank" stamp Israel Post (1988) Design: Ad van Ooijen Tilt: 25° |
What should have been a minor detail, the face value on "Anne Frank" was elevated to a level of graphic prominence equal to, if not surpassing, the prominence of the stamp's other details. Part of the reason stemmed from the face value's size and color, but an even larger part was due to its tilt. "Anne Frank" has a decidedly vertical nature: the four faces, as well as the five letters of "Israel" in Hebrew, are stacked one on top of the other; the building between them is tall and narrow; and a white right-side margin spans the height of the stamp. Rather than settle into the design's vertical orientation, the tilted face value disrupted it, and in so doing disrupted the solemnity of the stamp. Considered in isolation from van Ooijen's other stamp designs, the tilted face value is a puzzling feature. However, it is one for which he demonstrated a penchant repeatedly in his work.
![]() |
גליונית ברווזי ארץ ישראל "Ducks in the Holy Land" minisheet Israel Post (1989) Design: Ad van Ooijen Tilt: 10° |
Thanks to a 2019 article in the official magazine of the Israel Tour Guides Association by Jacob Vidas, a senior executive at Israel Post's philatelic service, the public was recently treated to a behind-the-scenes tour of the creative process that culminated in the "Ducks" minisheet. For example, as revealed in the article, the reason ducks were chosen for the 1989 event was because of a misunderstanding involving the annual U.S. Federal Duck Stamp contest that led Israel Post to believe American stamp collectors were enamored with stamps featuring ducks.2 As for the tilted design, Vidas suggested that the diagonal perforation was introduced for no other reason than to generate interest in the minisheet and capture the attention of collectors at the stamp expo. While the minisheet proved a resounding success and even came away from the expo with an award, the tilting to which at least some of that success was owed was, according to Vidas, arbitrary in nature, with no intrinsic relation to the stamps themselves. In other words, it was conceived as a gimmick, as a means of deviating from the norm for the sake of deviating from the norm.
![]() |
בול מאה שנה לעיתונות ילדים עברית "100 Years of Hebrew Magazines for Children" stamp Israel Post (1993) Design: Ad van Ooijen Tilt: 5° |
As with photos of recently deceased statesmen, historic manuscripts limit the creative license a stamp designer has, because the expectation is that the designer's representation will preserve the manuscript or photo in its original form. At the same time, the designer's stamp proposal needs to beat out the competition, and a key parameter evaluated by philatelic committee judges is originality. Tilting was Ad van Ooijen's method of balancing between preservation and innovation. In "Hebrew Magazines," van Ooijen remained faithful to the front page of Olam Katan in its original form at the same time that he left his unique imprint on the design by tilting the page. The question is not why van Ooijen tilted the image of the magazine but why he tilted everything else along with it. Had he tilted only the magazine, it would have been an elegant way of distinguishing it from the surrounding elements in the design. Tilting everything, however, contravened that effect by implying a single layer of information, in turn resulting in needless ambiguity.
![]() |
בול שבעים וחמש שנה לתרבות "75 Years of Tarbut" stamp Israel Post (1994) Design: Moshe Pereg Tilt: 30° |
In an interview with Yuval Saar of Haaretz in 2011, Pereg -- whose portfolio also includes coins, banknotes and commercial logos -- shared some of the philosophy underlying his approach to design. In his view, there are no accidents in the design process. Every detail has a purpose, down to the choice of one subtle color variation over another. Furthermore, if the viewer is not moved by the design or is left confused by it, the fault lies not with him but with the designer -- same as if a pianist were playing out of tune at a concert.3 While these standards were upheld in the case of Pereg's 1986 "Ben-Gurion Airport," where discrete design elements combined harmoniously to produce a symphonic visual experience, the same standards were clearly not upheld in the case of "Tarbut." The tilted "75" obscured the images beneath it and, being the largest and most colorful element of the stamp, claimed all of the attention for itself. It was the out-of-tune piano drowning out all the other instruments in the orchestra.
![]() |
גליונית ירושלים 2001 תערוכת בולים בין־לאומית "Jerusalem 2001 Multinational Stamp Exhibition" minisheet Israel Post (2001) Design: Igal Gabay Tilt: 5° |
"Jerusalem 2001," its image and perforation tilted relative to the minisheet edges but not relative to each other, took a page directly out of van Ooijen's book a-la 1989's "Ducks." Gabay, however, escalated the application of tilting a level higher, rotating additional motifs surrounding the stamp proper by varying degrees and in different directions: the year and name of the designer were tilted 10° from the vertical counterclockwise; a dotted "2001" was tilted 15° from the vertical clockwise; a column of white dots was tilted 5° from the vertical counterclockwise; a Morse code sequence was tilted 5° from the horizontal clockwise, matching the tilt of the perforation and tiles; and a row of gray dots was tilted 5° from the horizontal counterclockwise. Everything else was aligned horizontally. Now, if all the foregoing numbers and directions sound confusing, that's because "Jerusalem 2001" is a visually confusing minisheet. Had Gabay merely tilted the tiles, the result would have been a more coherent design, but there'd have been no novelty in it -- it would set no precedent, because van Ooijen had already done it. By tilting at various angles, Gabay succeeding in making his minisheet unique but in the process also fell into the trap of overdesigning.
![]() |
פובליציסטים: משה בילינסון Political Journalists: "Moshe Beilinson" stamp Israel Post (2002) Design: Igal Gabay Tilt: 5° |
Like his "Jerusalem 2001," Igal Gabay's "Moshe Beilinson" is a disorienting stamp -- not initially, but it becomes more disorienting the longer one looks at it. In a 2009 interview with Galit Hatan of Globes, Gabay equated his approach to stamp design with his approach to designing advertising posters. "They both come from the same mode of thought," he explained. "The same laws apply to a good poster and to a good stamp -- because in both cases the watch time is very fast (especially in the case of a road sign). People look at both from relatively far away, and everything needs to be understood immediately, the message needs to be sharp and clear. That is why I like clean stamps."4 Gabay's characterization of Israeli stamps as being graphically and functionally similar to advertisements is largely correct. Political Journalists demonstrates this reality: it is a set best appreciated superficially, as one would a promotional flyer. Once the eyes settle on the portrait, the design's internal inconsistencies begin making themselves felt -- first the oblique face value, tilted clockwise, then the title at top, tilted counterclockwise, and then all the rest. The face value and title start to resemble angry eyebrows on account of their proximity to the eyes, and the other tilted elements appear haphazardly spun like they were debris floating in water. Had the frame and other elements not been tilted, Political Journalists would have been less striking visually but more sound esthetically. In the case of one stamp in the set, "Rabbi Binyamin," the opposite rotational directions led to the caption in the tab overlapping the newspaper logo, making for an even sloppier design.
![]() |
בול 50 שנה לתעשייה האווירית "Israel Aircraft Industries — 50 Years" stamp Israel Post (2003) Design: Gad Almaliah, Aharon Shevo Tilt: 15-20° |
Like "Ben-Gurion Airport," another stamp that featured flight as a theme and tilting as a motif, "Israel Aircraft Industries" utilized tilting to convey an abstract idea. What idea? The idea of signals being transmitted along a circuit board's traces as a metaphor for speed, precision and efficiency. Making the effect more pronounced were the blue ribbons over which the text was made to appear sliding. Between the roaring and soaring Arrow missile splitting its background like a zipper being pulled open, the tilted text appearing to slide across the circuit board, and the circuit board that was itself tilted, "Israel Aircraft Industries" was a stamp teeming with fast-paced motion. Would the illustration have had the same effect were the design rectilinear and flat? Clearly it would not. The text would have looked like little more than a frame, the different design elements would have lacked integration, and the stamp would have felt static. Moreover, rather than being the stamp's defining feature, the tilting technique was woven into the design naturally, originally, and with finesse.
![]() |
גליונית התקווה "Hatikva" minisheet Israel Post (2008) Design: Baruch Naeh Tilt: 55-60° |
If the foregoing analysis has established anything with certainty, it is this: Tilting is an attention magnet. A designer who wishes a feature of his illustration to stand out has only to rotate that feature by some amount, and voila -- effect achieved. There are, however, other ways to capture attention, and one of them is to turn up the visual volume, to dazzle with size, color, density, and shape. Baruch Naeh, who has designed logos for dozens of Israeli companies, including Israel Post and El Al, has been in the business of capturing the attention of consumers for close to forty years, and "Hatikva" showcased a range of techniques Naeh brought to bear in this regard. Its logo-evoking imagery both celebrated Israel's stellar rise as a corporate brand and promoted Israel's sixtieth year of independence as an extravagant birthday bash. Bright lights and confetti aside, what was the message of "Hatikva"? The irony is that a minisheet purporting to represent the Jewish nation's hope of 2,000 years distilled that hope into a large flashy logo. Rather than being front and center, the national anthem -- the actual hope and the minisheet's namesake -- had its visibility reduced owing to its excessive tilt, dull gray color and peripheral position close to and slanting toward the corner. Having been relegated to the background, the anthem was on the outside of the party looking in. Making matters worse, there was an intent to trace the outline of the star with the lines of the anthem but a misaligned line six messed up the pattern. And speaking of misalignment, it seems odd that the "Hatikva" inside the star (60°) and the anthem outside it (55°) were out of alignment with each other by five degrees. Finally, it is not clear why the star's text was tilted in the first place, given that the stamp on the official first day cover was affixed with its text aligned horizontally.
![]() |
בול בית"ר ברית הנוער העברי "Betar — World Zionist Youth Movement" stamp Israel Post (2013) Design: Osnat Eshel Tilt: 20° |
For those at the unveiling ceremony who hadn't yet seen "Betar," their first encounter with the stamp must have been an awkward experience. Were the stamp a picture hanging on a wall, their instinct might have been to walk over and nudge it counterclockwise until it was hanging straight. What was it about the message of "Betar" -- which, given the publicity around it, was clearly an important stamp -- that necessitated such a profound departure from esthetic norms? One possibility is nothing: there was no implied deeper meaning and the tilt was purely arbitrary. In that case, substance was tossed overboard for the sake of style but the boat sank anyway and both were lost. Alternatively, there was a deeper meaning and the onus is on philatelists to coax it out. The scene represented in the stamp -- the uniformed youths arranged sequentially by height like soldiers, the flag's stripes seeming to extend long past the stamp's perforation, the lower tip of the flag's star fitting neatly into the hair of the middle girl, and the golden lion roaring up at the sky and the flag like a wolf howling at a full moon -- is loaded with gravitas. The quality embodied by the scene could also be described as hadar, Hebrew for "splendor," "grandeur" or "glory" and a core value in the Betar creed.7 Heads of state are often photographed posing with their chins raised and their eyes gazing off to the distance to make them look heroic and visionary. Whether deliberate or not, tilting the design conferred that same effect on the scene as a whole. A second potential interpretation involves considering that Betar, which was founded in 1923, is today perceived more as a symbol than an active movement. Whereas a horizontally flat design would have appeared static and frozen, tilting it clockwise evoked progress and growth. With no way of knowing for sure what the impetus was for tilting the design, logic suggests that the last two proposals, even if offered in a benefit-of-the-doubt spirit, are a side effect of overanalysis and that the simpler, i.e. meaningless, interpretation be favored.
![]() |
סופרים ומשוררים ישראלים: עמוס עוז Israeli Authors and Poets: "Amos Oz" stamp Israel Post (2020) Design: Osnat Eshel Tilt: 15° |
The quote in the stamp proper does not feel excessively tilted, and it may be that the fifteen-degree angle made it easier to fit the words into the image without it looking cluttered. There's an argument to be made that the caption should have remained horizontal, seeing as it was the quote that the design sought to highlight by way of size, color, the quotation marks, and the bookmark icon -- but that was not what sabotaged the stamps' appeal. What ultimately did that were the tabs, specifically the tilted images in them. When there is no conceivable reason for an image to be tilted -- and, unlike "Betar," in this case there wasn't -- the observer is left to conclude that the tilt is pointless. A design feature that is both prominent and pointless is a design feature that is in poor taste. Add to that the color filters applied to the images in the tab and the glaring use of stock photos, e.g. grain stalks in "Amos Oz," and the flavors Authors and Poets leaves in the mouth are cheap, amateurish and lazy.
![]() |
Conclusion Tilt: 10° |
In many ways tilting is to stamp design what shaky-cam is to filmmaking. Both manipulate the viewer's perception of reality; they are an artificial special effect imposed from without rather than an aspect developed from within; and rather than being a commentary on the nature of reality, they crucially obfuscate reality. Matt Zoller Seitz, writing in Salon, had this to say about the adoption of the shaky-cam technique by up-and-coming film directors:
The filmmakers' unspoken (in some cases probably unconscious) agenda is to deny the audience a fixed vantage point on anything, for any reason, ever -- not just to jack up their adrenaline level, but perhaps to cover weak storytelling, acting, writing or special effects with visual clutter and [wasted] motion. It's the style that directors embrace when they have no style -- a substitute for vision.8Replace Seitz's terminology from the realm of cinematography with its equivalent in the realm of stamp design, and his rant against shaky-cam applies with equal force to tilted stamps. In denying the viewer of the tilted stamp a fixed vantage point, tilting has a disorienting effect similar to the effect shaky-cam has on movie audiences. And as in the case of shaky-cam, more often than not tilting is a cover for laziness, inexperience, underdeveloped skills, and a weak imagination.
That tilting has established itself to the extent that it has among stamp designers in Israel confirms a trend suggested by visiting the galleries of modern art dealers around the country. Once the province of gifted, dedicated craftsmen, today these galleries represent the output of savvy software users and sophisticated 3D printers. Rather than emphasizing subtlety, detail, depth, intention, and novelty, the emphasis has shifted to being catchy, loud, obvious, shallow, and fun. None of this is to imply that all or even most Israeli stamps fall into the second category but that tilting, despite tending to push them in that direction, is a ditch Israeli stamp designers continue carelessly stumbling into and a curse that continues to haunt the stamps they design.
Note: Extensive use was made of Ginifab.com's Online Protractor in the preparation of this report.
I like the tilted effect in most cases here. I think it's creative and can be fun!
ReplyDeleteIt can definitely be creative and fun, and in some instances ingenious, but I still think is suffers from overuse. I appreciate your input!
Delete